212 research outputs found

    Shading Curves: Vector-Based Drawing With Explicit Gradient Control

    Get PDF
    A challenge in vector graphics is to define primitives that offer flexible manipulation of colour gradients. We propose a new primitive, called a shading curve, that supports explicit and local gradient control. This is achieved by associating shading profiles to each side of the curve. These shading profiles, which can be manually manipulated, represent the colour gradient out from their associated curves. Such explicit and local gradient control is challenging to achieve via the diffusion curve process, introduced in 2008, because it offers only implicit control of the colour gradient. We resolve this problem by using subdivision surfaces that are constructed from shading curves and their shading profiles.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Wiley via http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cgf.1253

    Cornsweet surfaces for selective contrast enhancement

    Get PDF
    A typical goal when enhancing the contrast of images is to increase the perceived contrast without altering the original feel of the image. Such contrast enhancement can be achieved by modelling Cornsweet profiles into the image. We demonstrate that previous methods aiming to model Cornsweet profiles for contrast enhancement, often employing the unsharp mask operator, are not robust to image content. To achieve robustness, we propose a fundamentally di erent vector-centric approach with Cornsweet surfaces. Cornsweet surfaces are parametrised 3D surfaces (2D in space, 1D in luminance enhancement) that are extruded or depressed in the luminance dimension to create countershading that respects image structure. In contrast to previous methods, our method is robust against the topology of the edges to be enhanced and the relative luminance across those edges. In user trials, our solution was significantly preferred over the most related contrast enhancement method.Kosinka was funded by EPSRC grant EP/H024816/1. Lieng was funded by a scholarship from the Norwegian Government.This is the accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0097849314000405

    Pericardial Thickness Measured With Transesophageal Echocardiography: Feasibility and Potential Clinical Usefulness

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjectives. This study assessed the reliability of transesophageal echocardiographic measurements of pericardial thickness and the potential diagnostic usefulness of this technique.Background. Transthoracic echocardiography cannot reliably detect thickened pericardium. The superior resolution achieved with transesophageal echocardiography should allow better pericardial definition.Methods. Pericardial thickness measured at 26 locations in 11 patients with constrictive pericarditis who underwent intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was compared with pericardial thickness measured with electron beam computed tomography. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were determined. Pericardial thickness was then measured in 21 normal subjects. With these values as a guide, two observers reviewed 37 transesophageal echocardiographic studies to determine whether echocardiographic measurement of pericardial thickness could be used to distinguish diseased from normal pericardium.Results. The correlation between echocardiographic and computed tomographic measurements (r ≄ 0.95, SE ≀ 0.06 mm, p < 0.0001) was excellent. The ±2 SD limits of agreement were ±1.0 mm or less for pericardial thickness <5.5 mm and ±2.0 mm or less for the entire range of thicknesses. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were good. Mean normal pericardial thickness was 1.2 ± 0.8 mm (±2 SD) and did not exceed 2.5 mm. Pericardial thickness ≄3 mm on transesophageal echocardiography was 95% sensitive and 86% specific for the detection of thickened pericardium.Conclusions. Measurement of pericardial thickness with transesophageal echocardiography is reproducible and should be a valuable adjunct in assessing constrictive pericarditis.(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1317–23

    Shorter GT repeats in the heme oxygenase-1 gene promoter are associated with a lower severity score in coronary artery disease

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background: The glutathione thymidine repeats [(GT) n ] of the heme oxygenase (HO)-1 gene promoter have been shown to be correlated with the incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD), patients with shorter repeats being less likely to have CAD. In this study, we investigated whether (GT) n repeats in the HO-1 promoter were related to a quantitative angiographic severity of CAD. Methods: The allele frequency of the HO-1 gene promoter (GT) n repeats was examined in CAD patients with de novo lesions (n Π328). Patients&apos; baseline coronary severity was quantified using the Jeopardy scoring system. Results: The allele frequency of GT repeats in the HO-1 gene promoter had bimodal peaks at (GT) 23 and (GT) 30. Therefore, we defined allele classes as follows: S allele (&lt;23 repeats), M allele (23e29 repeats), and L allele (!30 repeats). The group with severe CAD (Jeopardy score !8) had a significantly lower frequency of the S allele (3.7% vs. 8.9%; p Π0.042) than the group with moderate CAD (Jeopardy score &lt;8). None of the patient with the highest score of 12 (n Π17) carried the class S allele. In a multivariate binary logistic analysis, being a carrier of shorter GT repeats was a significant negative predictor (odds ratio 0.393; p Π0.024) of a higher Jeopardy score grade of CAD. Conclusion: Our study showed that shorter (GT) n repeat in the HO-1 gene promoter were associated with a lower Jeopardy severity score in patients with significant CAD

    Current practice in the removal of benign endometrial polyps: a Dutch survey

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the current practice of Dutch gynecologists in the removal of benign endometrial polyps and compare these results with the results of a previous study from 2003. In 2009 Dutch gynecologists were surveyed by a mailed questionnaire about polypectomy. Gynecologists answered questions about their individual performance of polypectomy: setting, form of anesthesia, method, and instrument use. The results were compared with the results from the previous survey. The response rate was 70% (585 of 837 gynecologists). Among the respondents, 455 (78%) stated to remove endometrial polyps themselves. Polyps were mostly removed in an inpatient setting (337; 74%) under general or regional anesthesia (247; 54%) and under direct hysteroscopic vision (411; 91%). Gynecologists working in a teaching hospital removed polyps more often in an outpatient setting compared with gynecologists working in a nonteaching hospital [118 (43%) vs. 35 (19%) p < 0.001]. These results are in accordance with the results from 2003. Compared to 2003 there was an increase in the number of gynecologists performing polypectomies with local or no anesthesia [211 (46%) vs. 98 (22%), p < 0.001]. An increase was also noted in the number of gynecologists using direct hysteroscopic vision [411 (91%) vs. 290 (64%), p < 0.001] and 5 Fr electrosurgical instruments [181 (44%) vs. 56 (19%), p < 0.001]. Compared to the situation in 2003, there is an increase in removal under direct hysteroscopic vision, with 5 Fr electrosurgical instruments, using local or no anesthesia. This implies there is progress in outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in the Netherlands

    Opposite-side flavour tagging of B mesons at the LHCb experiment

    Get PDF
    The calibration and performance of the oppositeside flavour tagging algorithms used for the measurements of time-dependent asymmetries at the LHCb experiment are described. The algorithms have been developed using simulated events and optimized and calibrated with B + →J/ψK +, B0 →J/ψK ∗0 and B0 →D ∗− ÎŒ + ΜΌ decay modes with 0.37 fb−1 of data collected in pp collisions at √ s = 7 TeV during the 2011 physics run. The oppositeside tagging power is determined in the B + → J/ψK + channel to be (2.10 ± 0.08 ± 0.24) %, where the first uncertainty is statistical and the second is systematic
    • 

    corecore